Uganda: Why LRA Remains Strong
 By Staff Writer
  KAMPALA--- A new report by the International Crisis Group (ICG),  the Brussels-based think tank says insufficient political will has thwarted  regional efforts to stop the murderous Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) but  vigorous diplomacy led by the African Union (AU), an immediate military push  and complementary civilian initiatives could end the misery of thousands. 
The  report--The Lord's Resistance Army: End Game?-- explains why Uganda's  half-hearted three-year offensive has failed to eliminate Joseph Kony's  guerrilla band and why there is now a new window of opportunity. Since peace  talks with the erstwhile northern Ugandan insurgency collapsed and a first  assault on Kony's camps was botched in late 2008, the Ugandan army has been  trying to catch scattered groups of fighters along the borders of DR Congo  (DRC), the Central African Republic (CAR) and South Sudan. In that period, the  LRA, now only a small but deadly criminal and terror band, has killed some  2,400 civilians, abducted some 3,400 and caused 440,000 to flee homes. 
“The  reasons for the military failure are at root political; Ugandan President  Museveni scaled down the anti-LRA mission to pursue other ventures that would  win him greater political capital at home and abroad”, says Ned Dalby, Crisis  Group's Central Africa Analyst. “Since the LRA no longer poses a threat to  northern Uganda, few opposition politicians or community leaders there demand  Museveni finish it off”. 
Uganda's  efforts to pursue combatants in DRC have been dogged by the host army's refusal  to cooperate and grant access to LRA-affected areas. Uganda invaded DRC in the  late 1990s, plundered its natural resources and earned President Joseph  Kabila's lasting mistrust. CAR President François Bozizé, equally suspicious,  has insisted the Ugandans leave diamond mining areas in his country. 
At the  request of some members, the AU stepped forward and said it would authorise a  counter-LRA mission. It plans to appoint a special envoy to smooth relations  between Kinshasa and Kampala and create new military structures to improve  coordination between the armies. However, planning has foundered due to  political constraints and the African body's limited capacity. 
The  Ugandan army, with its record of abuse and failure to protect civilians is an  imperfect vehicle, distrusted in the area. Kampala's commitment now that the  LRA no longer directly endangers its interests is reason for scepticism it has  the will to see the job through. But a military operation combined with  civilian efforts to entice surrenders remains the most feasible solution, and  the Ugandans are the only troops at hand for this. The U.S. is strengthening  its political and military engagement, including by sending several score  advisers to help them in the field on a short-term basis. Kony is believed to  be in the CAR. Before he crosses back into DRC and while U.S. support is  strong, the Ugandan army should make an urgent military push, prioritising  civilian protection, humanitarian access, better coordination and strict  accountability. 
To ensure  dividends, the AU must live up to its responsibilities as guarantor of  continental security and oversee a multi-dimensional regional initiative,  continuing after Kony's death or capture. It should appoint quickly a special  envoy to rally the political commitment of Uganda and the three affected states  and introduce a common operational and legal framework for the military  operation, keyed to civilian protection, thus giving continent-wide legitimacy.  Uganda and the U. 



